Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02296
Original file (BC 2013 02296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02296

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) be changed to allow entry into the Air Force Reserve (AFRES).  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His RE code of 2X is an error and unjust because he received an honorable discharge and completed his required active service.  His reentry code does not allow him the opportunity to serve in any reserve force and there are several available RE codes that would afford him that opportunity.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 Jul 03.

On 8 Apr 08, the applicant’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 30 Mar 07 thru 29 Mar 08, was referred to him for a rating of “Does Not Meet” standards in section III, Fitness, and comments relating to his failed fitness assessment (FA).  

On 10 Apr 10, the applicant’s EPR, rendered for the period 30 Mar 09 thru 29 Mar 10, was referred to him for a rating of “Does Not Meet” standards in section III, Fitness, and comments relating to his failed FA.

On 19 Oct 11, the applicant’s commander issued him an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not selected for reenlistment due to his FA failures.  On the same day, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action.  
On 3 Nov 11, the applicant indicated he did not intend to appeal the non-selection for reenlistment.  

On 17 Nov 11, the applicant’s EPR, rendered for the period 30 Mar 11 thru 1 Nov 11, was referred to him for a rating of “Does Not Meet” standards in section III, Fitness, and a comments relating to his third FA failure.  

On 31 Mar 12, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, with a narrative reason for separation of “Completion of Required Active Service,” along with a separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) and RE code of 2X.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.    

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice.  The applicant’s separation was due to being identified as eligible for the fiscal year 2012 (FY12) Air Force’s Force Shaping rollback program.  His commander non-selected him for reenlistment and the applicant did not appeal his decision.  In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority.  The SRP considers the member’s EPR ratings, unfavorable information from any substantiated source, and the airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the airman’s ability (or lack thereof) to meet required training and duty performance levels.  The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in regards to his non-selection for reenlistment.    

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Jul 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence or evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02296 in Executive Session on 27 Feb 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 May 13, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 20 Jun 13.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jul 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

2


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00175

    Original file (BC-2013-00175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00175

    Original file (BC 2013 00175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05829

    Original file (BC 2012 05829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 1J (eligible to reenlist but elected to separate). The remaining relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05829

    Original file (BC 2012 05829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05829 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to 1J (eligible to reenlist but elected to separate). The remaining relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02502

    Original file (BC 2013 02502.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records be corrected to show that he is now and was promotion eligible during the time he was placed on a Control Roster. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOA recommends closing the case, since the applicant's record currently reflects his requested actions and they do not have the history, nor are they the OPR for control roster actions; however, based on the information provided the previous RE code 4I would have been a result of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02703

    Original file (BC 2013 02703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not provided any proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and his non-selection for reenlistment was in accordance with current guidance. While the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594

    Original file (BC 2014 00594.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02848

    Original file (BC 2013 02848.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02848 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded so that he can reenlist in the US Marine Corps (USMC). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220

    Original file (BC 2013 01220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00009

    Original file (BC 2014 00009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 24 Jan 14, for a period of three years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial with respect to the applicant’s request for his lost time to be reinstated. A complete copy of the...